Fresh controversy has emerged in the race for the Awujale stool, as moves to petition an anti-graft agency over the affairs of a leading aspirant, Omooba Abimbola Onabanjo (OAO), raise questions about the conduct of contenders and the integrity of the succession process.
Sources indicate that a formal petition is being finalised, seeking an investigation into Onabanjo’s financial dealings, assets, and related activities.
The development is believed to be backed by interests within the contest, including a fellow aspirant, though details remain unclear.
The situation has drawn mixed reactions from observers. While some argue that public office aspirants should be open to scrutiny, others warn against the use of state institutions in what could be perceived as intra-contest rivalry.
Gboyega Adeoye, Executive Director of Media for Ethnic Equality (MEE), expressed concern over the unfolding developments, cautioning against the politicisation of anti-corruption processes.
“Anti-graft institutions must be protected from undue influence. While no individual should be above investigation, such actions must be driven by credible evidence, not competition or personal interests,” he said.
Adeoye also noted that the current developments reflect broader tensions surrounding the Awujale succession, which has attracted significant public interest and multiple claimants.
Analysts say the situation underscores the need for transparency and adherence to due process, as stakeholders continue to monitor how the allegations and counterclaims may shape the outcome of the selection.
The Awujale stool, a highly respected traditional institution, has in recent times been the focus of intense contest, with Onabanjo regarded as one of the prominent figures in the race.
